About Services
Smart Energy Smart Water & IoT Building Automation Security & Assets Connectivity Cybersecurity Data & AI
Why CPS Case Studies FAQ Contact Us
Technician checking a pump health reading on a tablet beside blue industrial pumps
Representative scenario

Predicting pump failures before they stop a treatment works

A wastewater treatment works services its pumps on a calendar and still loses them unexpectedly. This is how we’d use sensor data and machine learning to see failures coming and plan around them.

Sector
Water and wastewater treatment
Setting
Treatment works with 24 critical pumps and blowers
Illustrative scale
Around 24 assets and 150+ sensor channels
Core components
Vibration and temperature sensors, energy analysers, edge gateway, historian, machine-learning models
Protocols
Modbus TCP, MQTT, OPC UA
Typical programme
4–6 months, including a learning period

The challenge

The works maintains its pumps and blowers on fixed intervals. Some are opened up while still healthy; others fail between services, usually at night or in a storm, when inflow is highest.

An unplanned failure means emergency call-outs, hired standby pumps, overtime and sometimes a spill that has to be reported. The parts that wear out (bearings, seals, impellers) give warning signs for weeks, but nobody is watching for them.

Our approach

  1. Criticality ranking

    With the maintenance team, we rank every pump and blower by what its failure costs, so sensors go first on the assets where an early warning pays back fastest.

  2. Instrument the assets

    Vibration and temperature sensors go on bearings and motors, and energy analysers measure motor current and power. An edge gateway collects this alongside existing SCADA values like flow and pressure.

  3. Learn normal behaviour

    Models learn each machine’s normal signature across its duty points over several weeks. Rising vibration, creeping temperatures or more power for the same flow then stand out as early signs of wear.

  4. Turn alerts into work orders

    Each alert names the asset, the likely fault and how urgent it is, and goes into maintenance planning. The team records what technicians actually find, and that feedback tunes the models.

System architecture

How the layers connect, from the people using the system down to the equipment in the field.

People
  • Maintenance planner
  • Technicians
  • Plant manager (monthly asset health report)
Analytics
  • Machine-learning model per asset
  • Health scores
  • Alert triage
Data
  • Historian
  • Existing SCADA values: flow, pressure, run hours
Edge
  • Edge gateway
  • MQTT and OPC UA publishing
Sensors
  • Vibration
  • Bearing and winding temperature
  • Energy analysers on motor feeds

What we’d deploy

Target outcomes

Weeks
Early warning of bearing and seal wear
Planned
Repairs scheduled instead of emergency call-outs
Per asset
Health score for every critical pump and blower
Quarterly
Reviews of alerts against what technicians find

Targets we would design and report against, not measured results from a named client. Actual results depend on the baseline established in the audit.

Common Questions

Questions about
this kind of project.

How long before the models are useful?

Most assets need several weeks of data across their normal operating range before alerts are reliable. Simple vibration and temperature alarms protect them from day one while the models learn.

Do we need new pumps or a new SCADA?

No. Sensors clamp or bolt onto existing machines, and the gateway reads the SCADA values you already collect.

Is the AI making decisions on its own?

No. Models flag risk and explain why; your maintenance team decides what to do. Every alert is reviewed, and that feedback is what improves the models.

Keep Reading

More case studies.

All case studies
Get Started

Let’s build Africa’s
smart future together.

Rising energy costs, water scarcity, and tightening ESG mandates demand a partner who has solved these challenges before.

Chat with us